Brief English Introduction
The case turns a common loyalty-duty fact pattern into a concrete Chinese law problem: managers and supervisors participate in a competing entity while still owing duties to the original company.
Use It For
Use this case for Article 180-style loyalty and diligence analysis, corporate opportunities, competing business, disgorgement, and supervisor responsibility beyond passive oversight.
Teaching Notes
Have students identify each defendant’s office, factual role, and remedy exposure. The facts help prevent a flat analysis that treats directors, officers, and supervisors as interchangeable.