Facts
A director of a manufacturing company owns 40 percent of a supplier. The director does not disclose this interest and persuades the board to approve a long-term supply contract. The controlling shareholder knew about the conflict and pressured two directors to vote yes.
Questions
- Which persons may owe duties or bear responsibility?
- What disclosure, approval, and fairness facts matter?
- How would a comparative Caremark or Van Gorkom argument differ from a Chinese Company Law argument?
Hints
Make a responsibility table for directors, senior officers, controllers, and the company. Do not treat all comparative fiduciary-duty vocabulary as interchangeable.
Discussion Guide
Students should identify loyalty, diligence, related-party transaction, controller influence, and remedy questions. Comparative discussion should be used to sharpen analysis, not replace Chinese statutory reasoning.